Is MetaTana affiliated with FileBot?
No. MetaTana is not affiliated with FileBot. This page is a product comparison for people evaluating a FileBot alternative.
FileBot is a mature renamer with powerful format expressions and command-line automation. MetaTana takes a different approach: a free core organizer that runs in Docker or on the desktop, proposes reviewable renames, writes NFO and artwork beside your files, and journals every change so any pass can be rolled back.
FileBot is excellent at turning messy names into clean ones. The question is what happens next: whether metadata, artwork, and sidecars land on disk, and whether you can undo a pass that went wrong.
The strongest fit is a lawful local library where the problem is not one bad file name. It is repeated cleanup across thousands of files, clients, and sidecars — and wanting a safety net.
If FileBot already cleaned your file names, that work counts. MetaTana reads the local truth beside your files — names, folder context, NFO, artwork, and subtitles — and focuses on what is still missing, with a diff you approve before anything is written.
No. MetaTana is not affiliated with FileBot. This page is a product comparison for people evaluating a FileBot alternative.
The media organizer is free, including local bring-your-own-key provider lookups. Pro adds hosted AI Vision credits and the MCP server at US$5 per month or US$50 per year.
Yes. FileBot is mature and its rename format expressions and command-line automation are genuinely powerful. MetaTana suits operators who want a free core, a Docker runtime, reviewable and reversible writes, and metadata written to disk without scripting.
Yes. MetaTana proposes a clean, server-friendly layout, shows the diff before anything touches disk, moves subtitles and artwork alongside each title, and journals every rename so it can be rolled back. It does not modify the media files themselves.